<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Lebanese Federalism and Decentralization: Its Proponents and Discontents </title>
		<description>Discuss Lebanese Federalism and Decentralization: Its Proponents and Discontents </description>
		<link>http://www.mepei.com/in-focus/348-lebanese-federalism-and-decentralization</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:19:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Michel says:</title>
			<link>http://www.mepei.com/in-focus/348-lebanese-federalism-and-decentralization#comment-4</link>
			<description>The only solution for Lebanon is by adopting federalism. Too bad Samir Geagea dropped federalism in favor of Taef accord to please Saad Hariri.</description>
			<author>Michel</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:26:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cedar Guard says:</title>
			<link>http://www.mepei.com/in-focus/348-lebanese-federalism-and-decentralization#comment-3</link>
			<description>Excellent article. Regards to the author. Just allow me 1 comment: The FPM and Aonist movements never publically embraced a nationalist ideology. The FPM views - especially the recent ones - do not reflect the poltical stands of the Guardians of the Cedars, Tanzim, and the Lebanese Nationalist Parties. Even more, a form of decentralization does not necessarily contradict Lebanese Nationalism.</description>
			<author>Cedar Guard</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:49:50 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
